❄️🔥 “Where is the national security case?” — Col. Douglas MacgregorWhy the Strategic Case for Greenland Still Doesn’t Exist — and What That Reveals About U.S. Foreign Policy
❄️🔥 “Where is the national security case for why we absolutely need to control Greenland?” — Col. Douglas Macgregor ⚠️ Macgregor (@DougAMacgregor) says the push to control Greenland rests on a “threat narrative without evidence.” 🌍 He challenges claims of Russian or Chinese “incursion, invasion, occupation,” calling the idea “a crazy notion.” 🛢️ He notes the justification keeps shifting — from oil and gas to rare earths to national security — with no clear rationale. ❓ Macgregor asks the core question: “What is the national security imperative that means Greenland has to be governed by the United States?” 🔍 A sharp breakdown of why the strategic argument simply doesn’t add up. 🎥 A must‑watch clip for anyone following U.S. Arctic policy and global strategy. You're currently a free subscriber to Daniel Davis Deep Dive. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. © 2026 Daniel L. Davis |